• Stay up to date!

    Your email:

     

  • Recent Posts

    • Picturing Climate Change – Workshop
    • Interview with Malcolm McLaren: Does the future bring the post-neo punk?
    • Picturing Climate Change – The Victims (2)
    • Picturing Climate Change – The Initiators (1)
    • Picturing Climate Change
  •  

    January 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Dec   Feb »
     123456
    78910111213
    14151617181920
    21222324252627
    28293031  
  • My Tweets

    • papagei gefunden #albandeira #porches #armacaodepera 8 hrs ago
    • Time for some lazy summer weeks. 2 weeks ago
    • More updates...

    Powered by Twitter Tools

  • Categories

    • 100 cups
    • Announcement
    • architecture
    • Background
    • climate change
    • Comment
    • competition
    • Creative Places and Spaces
    • Design Research
    • Event
    • Experimental Design
    • Gloss
    • Interview
    • People
    • Promotion Poetry
    • Report
    • Reportage
    • Review
    • Rheindesign
    • Stupid Design
    • Sustainablity
    • Visions
  • Visit ROGER!

    Roger issue no. 4
    ...and find out about issue No. 4
  • Zeitgeist: 100 CUPS

    www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing items in a set called 100 CUPS. Make your own badge here.
  • Look here:

    bodalgo/copy | Der Marktplatz für Texter, Autoren & Redakteure

  • Links

    • ALR
    • Anamorphosis Kate
    • BerlinDesignBlog
    • Design tut gut
    • Designer in Action
    • Designers are Wankers
    • Electric Angel – Design for Life
    • Social Design
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
  • die for German Development Aid

    Comment, Stupid Design

    The doorplate at the German Development Institute in BonnHere is an interesting case of design with limited view. In the picture you can see the »doorplate« of the German Development Institute that is located in Bonn, the former German capital.

    »The German Development Institute / Deutsches Institut für Entwicklungspolitik (DIE) sees itself as the think tank for German development policy.«

    Unfortunately the initials of the institute in German language result in the letters »die«. That did not stop the inventors of the name to baptise the child with the brand »die«. And it did not stop the designers to take this initals as the basic component for the logo. Now there could be three ways how such a Stupid Design forms:

    1: In the year 1964, when the institute was opened, english language was not that important as it is nowadays and the Germans just would not realise what »die« means (But even in the 60s development aid must have taken place in countries where German is not the first language.)

    2: »die« is a courageous indicator to what happens if there would not be development aid or what development aid is fighting against.

    3: It’s just a good example of »officialese« (Beamtensprache) and what happens if public authorities think about communications.

    Posted January 30, 2008 by Marco Siebertz

    Responses (0)

    © 2008 ROGER LiVE – Social Design Blog - Design: Marco Siebertz
    RSS Feed - XHTML - CSS