• Links

    • ALR
    • Anamorphosis Kate
    • BerlinDesignBlog
    • Design tut gut
    • Designer in Action
    • Designers are Wankers
    • Electric Angel – Design for Life
    • Social Design
  • Search

  • My Tweets

    • @_goldmarie_ Viel Glück! in reply to _goldmarie_ 2012-02-01
    • Endlich da: das neue Corporate Design der DW: http://t.co/aaEzcCSe 2012-02-01
    • @_goldmarie_ Was wird denn präsentiert? in reply to _goldmarie_ 2012-02-01
    • Vielleicht muss auch im Westen erst das Volk zur Revolution schreiten, um dem Kapitalismus Schranken zu setzen. #occupywallstreet 2011-10-08
    • More updates...

    Powered by Twitter Tools

  •  

    October 2008
    M T W T F S S
    « Sep   Nov »
     12345
    6789101112
    13141516171819
    20212223242526
    2728293031  
  • Categories

    • 100 cups
    • Announcement
    • Annoying
    • architecture
    • Background
    • climate change
    • Comment
    • competition
    • Creative Places and Spaces
    • Design Research
    • Design Thinking
    • Event
    • Experimental Design
    • Gloss
    • Interview
    • People
    • Promotion Poetry
    • Report
    • Reportage
    • Review
    • Rheindesign
    • Social Design
    • Stupid Design
    • Sustainablity
    • Visions
  • Visit ROGER!

    Roger issue no. 4
    ...and find out about issue No. 4
  • Zeitgeist: 100 CUPS

    www.flickr.com
    This is a Flickr badge showing items in a set called 100 CUPS. Make your own badge here.
  • AdDeco

    Ad Decoration

  • Look here:

    bodalgo/copy | Der Marktplatz für Texter, Autoren & Redakteure

  • Links

    • ALR
    • Anamorphosis Kate
    • BerlinDesignBlog
    • Design tut gut
    • Designer in Action
    • Designers are Wankers
    • Electric Angel – Design for Life
    • Social Design
  • Meta

    • Log in
    • Entries RSS
    • Comments RSS
    • WordPress.org
  • Excessing surveillance: Naked body scans

    Comment, Stupid Design

    The new X-ray scanners make anything visible under your clothes.

    The new X-ray scanners make anything visible that is under your clothes (photo via BBC).

    “Europe delays airport X-ray eye” was what I read on BBC News today. Subject was the plan of the E.U. to introduce full body scanners that scan the whole body of passengers at security checks on European airports. The plan is now delayed as the members of the European Parliament (MEP) voted for a further study on the implications for privacy and health.

    Scanners that make the whole naked body of a passenger visible to the security staff – a sick surveillance idea that cannot be found even in the repertoire of George Orwell’s “1984″. Unbelievable in first hand is the fact, that passengers (=human beings with their own privacy) are confronted with machines that have such a deep impact on their privacy without being warned – if not by coincident the topic stumbles onto the front pages of newspapers, tv’s and websites.

    Well, so our MEPs decided that the “implications for privacy and health” should be further examined. So what was the primary object of study? Which amount of electromagnetic or X-ray radiation is necessary for operating the full body scan? Or how easily the scanner is in handling? How much time it consumes to expose the passenger?

    There is a huge problem with new technologies: machines are primarily or even only tested on their physical effects, but not on their implications for society and humanity. How does the new full body scanners effect people whose small breasts and penises, love handles or artificial anuses become visible? What happens if pictues from the scanners find their way into the internet (as we know it is a common thing that especially in the U.K. data get lost now and then)? How is human dignity affected by such measures?

    When it comes to new technologies, the societal and human implications definetely have to be the first that need to be regarded. As an act of humaneness, there is no other possibility. In this case, however, it is not even a matter of social research, but a matter of justice: Full body scanners simply offend our basic rights.

    • Twitter
    • Digg
    • Facebook
    • del.icio.us
    • MisterWong
    • Technorati
    • Reddit
    • StumbleUpon
    • Google Bookmarks
    • PDF
    • Twitthis

    Posted October 23, 2008 by Marco Barooah-Siebertz

    3 Responses to “Excessing surveillance: Naked body scans”

    1. bob franco says:
      January 2, 2010 at 06:51:08

      how much radiation will the person be exposed to in one episode?

    2. Marco Siebertz says:
      January 2, 2010 at 12:39:49

      I do not have the technical specifications of those scanners. As it seems feasible that there will be more than one supplier, the radiation might vary.

      What concerns me more is that you have “to put down your trowsers” anytime you want to fly. At least within Europe travelling by train becomes a true alternative. “Travelling with dignity” if you want…

    3. Tomas Estrada-palma says:
      January 6, 2010 at 01:20:36

      Nah. It’s worse that that. Do you suppose if this young woman knew the images would look this clear before they are blurred then released to a duped public she would have been scanned?

      http://tomasestradapalma4today.blogspot.com/2010/01/origin-of-naked-airport-scan-image.html

      Oh by the way if you run into her tell her she buck naked on the Internet.

    Leave a Reply

    Click here to cancel reply.

    © 2008 ROGER LiVE – Social Design Blog - Design: Marco Siebertz
    RSS Feed - XHTML - CSS